How to be single The experiential dating advice blog

15Dec/092

Introducing….ME!

My name is Veronika – a pseudonym – as I’d very much like to retain my anonymity. I’m a 27, cute and fit, IT professional, and I’m single by choice. The articles that I write will document my dating experiences. I’ve recently setup a profile on Plenty of Fish and am ready to really put myself out there. Some of the topics I intend to write about are: how to write a good profile, expectations from online dating, and – as they happen – my dating experiences present (and some past ones.) I will do my best to entertain you with my already promisingly humourous stories. I am not going to write any negative posts about men because I generally love men. If you’re looking for a blogger who will bash or vent about men, you shall be very disappointed. Hopefully, I can continue to amuse the readers as did my predecessor, by poking fun at myself and my dates. I’ve already met someone from Plenty of Fish and, to foreshadow, the date was so bad, that three articles are required to sufficiently describe its horror-icity?!

6Dec/091

A picture is worth < 1000 words: how to write a great on-line profile – Part III

OK – I’ve kept you waiting long enough for the final installment of this 3-part series: my profile. A short preamble before I reveal to you my masterpiece. During the latter 5 months of my on-line presence (specifically, on PoF), I had 2 profiles: one adhered strictly to the boring suggestions by PoF – about me, about him, aspirations/goals, favourites; and a second one – which was completely “me”. The idea to write an original profile came from my friend Robert, mixed in with my affinity for writing limericks, which I’ve been doing somewhat consistently for friends’ birthdays.

For those of you who don’t know what a limerick is, here’s an excerpt from Wikipedia article on “Limerick (poetry)”… in limerick format:

A limerick packs laughs anatomical
In space that is quite economical
But the good ones I’ve seen
So seldom are clean
And the cleans ones so seldom are comical

(Anonymous)

And now my profile…

A 5-part limerick

A young maiden from Ottawa once sought,
A thing that often cannot be bought.
A love so true, so rare,
More than a casual affair,
From a knight who a valiant battle had fought.

By all accounts, the maiden was very fair,
Confident, smart, with brown-reddish hair.
Her eyes green like a precious stone,
She had presence, fit for the throne,
And soft touch, that could lay your soul bare

In her match, she desired a respectful soul,
With good character, a job, and a life goal.
Funny, he should be,
And punctual to a tee;
Who sees beyond a video-games control.

Long walks on the beach are too cliché,
Perhaps a picnic in the park, or a shared sorbet!
Thoughtful acts aplenty,
For a damsel so dainty;
Perhaps, too, an occasional red-rose bouquet.

As dictate the principles of limerick-writing,
The piece aforesaid, can be more "exciting".
So the maiden - a lively coquette,
Who enjoys a lengthy romp in the bed,
Asserts that her mate she will be delighting!

6Dec/090

A picture is worth < 1000 words: how to write a great on-line profile – Part II

My newfound love is one of the inspirations for this article. However, another major inspiration was my friend and personal mentor – Robert – who has recently became engaged to a lovely lady he’d met online just 5 months ago. In fact, they are getting married in December. Some of you are probably thinking “Fools!” but, to those who know them, it’s quite clear that it’s a match made by Gods themselves (perhaps by Neptune, since they met on Plenty of Fish.)

Some background information: I had been trying to convince Robert to try online dating for years. But, he didn’t do it. “I’m not ready,” he claimed over and time again. Finally, in May 09, he ‘became’ ready. Easier said than done! Robert painstakingly and tirelessly worked on his profile, to ensure that it was representative of his true self – and this process took (too) much time. During the – oh probably 2 weeks – he solicited the feedback of his family and friends, on everything from the perfect screen name to photos to the description.

Finally (finally!) in June, he released his masterpiece on PoF. Before I reveal his profile to you (with his permission), I will confess that, had I been perusing his profile, I would have never messaged him. I just don’t ‘get it.’ But, that is exactly what his intent was: to ensure that only people who “got it” messaged him. In fact, some women e-mailed Robert stating “I don’t understand your profile.” Well, too bad for them, I say!

So, the lesson of this post is: make your profile your own.

Profile of Eloquent Woodman:

Interests

outdoors canoeing hiking
teaching philosophy spirituality
music yoga massage
cooking entertaining red wine
campfires thunderstorms poetry
travel trail biking writing
books movies cuddling
live theatre art galleries sushi
family friends deep conversations

About Me

I'm an ambivert with an energizing job. My life makes a difference.
I'll tease your brain and I don't come in a box. I'm kind of
refreshing and unexpected because I'm yours to discover but there's
always more to me.

I think a lot and I feel a lot. I choose the few over the many, and I
have my doubts about certainty. I'm wrong about a lot of things, but
I'm open to the possibility that I might be wrong about that too. I
learn more that way and have more fun, because it hurts to be
constipated. (When that happens, I eat chocolate.)

I like relaxing in the evenings and recharging on vacations. I spend
time writing, speaking, and teaching. I lead people in creative ways
and I am trusted to develop the somewhat young and impressionable in a
variety of settings. I love people by seeing the unique possibilities
within them. (If your mom and dad really love you, or if you have a
best friend who totally believes in you, you know what I'm talking
about.) I make my own music and I'll fool around on the piano and let
the emotions flow.

Creativity and playfulness are big turn-ons for me. I find women that
confidently and naturally show their strength and smarts are
particularly sexy. I admire breadth, depth, balance, integrity and a
sense of history. My family and friends are very important to me. I'm
a fan of cuddling, and I ardently embrace the unexpected options.
(Sometimes I do let opportunity knock a while though, but it's 'cause
I'm in the shower.)

I need to get dirty and I need to clean up. I'm into both town and
country. I live for today with a general direction for tomorrow. I
change my plans not my character. I dress up and I dress down. I like
nature, culture, have high standards in cooking, and I think eating
healthy tastes best.

I am adventurous and spontaneous, but I believe in boundaries and
limits. I hope you have some intelligent ones, as I'm attracted to
people who respect themselves. I like pie crusts, nuts, vegetables and
potatoes, but I'll never ask for a second helping of flaky, crazy,
dumb or lazy. I like responses that dare to be different and emphasize
brain over boob. It's not about length: let me know I've struck a
chord by attempting to pluck one of your own. That way, we don't waste
our time stringing each other along.

Are you a stream of consciousness?
You have a fairy godmother.
You approve of semicolons, compound sentences and appropriate capitalization.
You are artistic, synergistic, optimistic and uber-califragilistic. (Jawohl!)
You are musical, whimsical, historical, sexual, ecumenical and biodegradable.
Your rejection of "starved to perfection" makes you a wiser exerciser.
You prefer organically grown and also orgasmically groan.
You can take a hike.
You're good for the planet and you're good for me.

Like a river, are you elemental? Always true to yourself; not watered
down. Now ebulliently energetic; now deep and still. Here a gentle
trickle; there a powerful rush. Warm. Cool. Breathtaking. Always
refreshing. I like your hidden dangers, your twists and turns, but you
can't be about meaningless forking or hooking up.

As Catwoman and Selina Kyle, are you deeper than a puddle, more
powerful than a logical motive, faster than speeding bullshit? Do you
stand for truth, justice and the Canadian way? Could you handle
someone who deeply understood you without ever actually being able to
do so, challenged you, never let you get away with it, had depth,
intensity, serenity and character and a hot ass and was maybe the kind
of person your mom warned you about while also secretly being in
favour of?

I'm looking for a woman who will bring out the absolute best in me and
I'll do the same for her. I need it all, sometimes both of us going
zoom-zoom, sometimes one fast, the other slow, sometimes you,
sometimes me, sometimes we lie still under the stars and listen to
your heartbeat. You could be the one -- or one of the ones -- a number
ten gale on the Beaufort Scale. I'd spend an eternal moment in the
silent anticipation of your softest breath. Hit me like a force of
nature, or blow me away with whispered depth and strength.

P.S. The Beaufort is a 12 point scale, so you only need to be an 8.3.

First Date

I'm focused on finding a soul-to-soul match for the long-term, because
that's where the real excitement and fulfillment is. I don't care how
much hair I have to climb (Rapunzel), how many beauties I have to kiss
(God give me strength!), or how many witches, trolls and goblins are
involved (they make for good stories). Along the way, I'm into having
fun and being playful and making some new friends by helping them get
a better idea of who they are and what they want (without charming the
pants off them).

Boldness earns my respect. Flakiness and hesitation are your
subconscious saying you're not right for me. If most of your physical
activity takes place within your digestive system, I won't be able to
keep up with you. And most importantly, if you believe a first date is
a long-term relationship, then the voices in your head are telling you
that you're MUCH too good for me! Listen to them! (I'm pretty sure
every woman on this site could recommend guys who would be PERFECT for
you.)

15Oct/091

To do or not to do? The infamous 3rd Date

Extra! Extra! This just in! I went on a 2nd date. Whoa, right?! Right?!  To put it into perspective, this is the first time that I’ve gone on a 2nd date with a guy I met online. (Okay, technically, that’s not entirely true. Back in ’07, I did go on multiple dates with a nice boy. But that didn’t go anywhere due to diverging life paths.)

Naturally, after the date – as after all my dates – I debriefed with my dating coaches (I have 2 – very important people) and my friends. Let me digress for a bit and say: if you don’t have a dating coach, get one. It’s always best to have someone who is familiar with the dating scene.

OK, back to the topic at hand. At the debrief, a very interesting discussion ensued. (In fact – when you factor in that this discussion took place over lunch, at work – you can most certainly claim that it was a NSFW discussion (not safe for work). Since we seem to have these discussions often, I’ve began thinking of starting a podcast… or my own reality TV show. If I do, it’ll definitely be titled NSFW.) Crikey, I digressed again.

So, the discussion was around the whole societal myth that on Date 3, you sleep with him/her. In reality, if you analyze how much you can learn about your date, in the 1-2 hours, then factor in two dates and weigh it against the emotional impact of having sex with someone, the “infamous Date 3” seems implausible. Yet, many amongst us commonly believe the following:

Date 1 = meet, talk, get to know each other, maybe kiss

Date 2 = talk more, discover move, kiss, maybe take off some clothes

Date 3 = talk yet more, you – or he – stays over for breakfast

I was curious to see if this “Date 3” myth was indeed a reality, so I Googled. The response… is… well, not really a response. As with all human issues – the answer varies: by sex, by age, and by personal choice. Thus, my advice is: if you are faced with this decision: to do or not to do (on Date 3), consider the following:

  1. If given the chance, guys *will* do it on the 1st/2nd/3rd date, so it’s usually up to girl to set the pace (unless she’s a sex addict). Tip: if your resolve is weak, it’s best not to go on dates that involve alcohol.
  2. What do you want? Set expectations for yourself, and level-set your mate to them. Honesty is the best policy.
  3. Generally, if subsequent dates are spaced out (more than 2 weeks between dates), the Date-o-meter is reset every time. So, basically, you’re not subjected to the societal standards.

For comic relief, the *top* response came from one of my dating coaches (male) who said: “if I could have, I would have done her on Date 1.” Yes, men are that primitive. I also recommend the following AskMen article.

In the end though, my advice is:  figure out what you want (if you're looking for a long-term thing, falling into bed with him on Date 1 will definitely send the wrong message), and stick to your guns.

In the interest of keeping this blog PG13, I’ll admit that I had many “opportunities” on Date 2. However, I adhered to my personal standards, which I shared with him: I told him that I wasn’t looking for a “just a toss-in-the-hay,” and directed him to look elsewhere, if that were all he was looking for. Date 3 is pending.

13Oct/093

Ingenuous thought of today

Men are primitive creatures. When we (as women) fully come to terms with this, we will be less often disappointed by their primitive acts (i.e. not putting the toilet seat down), and more often surprised by those occasional acts that transcend primitiveness (i.e. opening the car door.)

And while I admit that this is not true of all men, it's best to be prepared for the "worst-case" scenario.

26Aug/096

L is for Ludicrous

(Not to be confused with Ludacris, the rapper.) Seriously, ludicrous is just the word to describe the date I had last Sunday; it left me laughing from its absurdity. Let’s rewind and reflect:

Earlier last week, I was online, browsing guys’ profiles on PoF. I actually messaged a few of them, and SUCCESS: I had a few replies. So on Sunday night, I arranged to meet with Buddy at 7 pm at a local pub. On my computer screen, he looked great: good-looking, successful, well traveled, speaks 4 languages, etc. Sadly, I wasn’t wearing my reading glasses when I read his profile. So, what was wrong with him? What wasn’t!?

  • He lied on his online profile (age and photo)
  • Was 25 minutes late
  • When he (finally) showed up, he was drunk (he admitted to it)
  • Put excessive emphasis on the monetary value of things
  • Made inappropriate 1st date “compliments”
  • Looked like Billy Bob (this is only bad if you don’t like Billy Bob. I don’t.)

As I mentioned, we had agreed to meet at 7. Well, you should know by now, that I’m never late for a date (except for that one time), so I arrived right on time, hoping (against hope) that here is one guy who knows the definition of punctuality. Well, apparently Merriam-Webster will be removing “punctuality” from the dictionary in its 2010 edition. (For a complete list of words they are removing/adding/modifying, see here)

So, I settle down and wait. At 7:07 pm, I receive a text: “OMG. Lost track of time, leaving now be there in 10 minutes”. What a great feeling it is to know you’re someone’s priority! So, dejected but determined to go on this date, I let him know that I’m wearing a green dress, and will be waiting on the patio (with a beer in hand).

He replies: “Because I’m ran late, I’m wearing a hat with a beaver on it. Don’t worry though; I bought the hat at Holt Renfrew. LOL. It’s not a hoser hat.”

As I’m reading this message, an alarm is going off in my head: in my opinion, any guy who flaunts brand names and high-end stores clearly puts a lot of stock in the material things.

Buddy finally arrives at 7:25. I notice right away that he doesn’t look the 30 he said on his profile, and that he’s carrying a 6-pack too many around his mid-section, also unlike his profile picture. (Later in our conversation, it comes out that he’s actually 34.) But, I also tend to look different (though, not fatter) from one picture to another, so I gave him the benefit of the doubt.

Well, it turns out that Buddy doesn’t waste any time with small talk: 15 minutes into our conversation he asks: “So, what are you looking for? Are you looking for sex?” Whoa, Buddy! I’m all about level-setting expectations, but there is a more tactful way to initiate that conversation. But, as by then, I’ve already made up my mind about him, I answer his question honestly.

As we continue to chat, my first impression – that of him being $$$ value obsessed – is reinforced. He talks about his 1M dollar company, his $3300 loft, etc. I realize that this may appeal to some women (*cough* golddiggers *cough*) but I’m not so easily impressed! Then, out of the blue, he blurts out: “God, you must be fun to talk to naked.” Um… thanks? (… and you will not be finding out.)

The rest of this story is anticlimactic…except for the very end. As I’m getting ready to leave, he calculatedly asks: “So, what do you think about us.”  Naturally, I deflect: “I need to mull it over.” He replies: “If you have to think about it, then you don’t have to think about it.” Touché!  And just like that, Buddy and our date was history.

In retrospect, even though it was just another failed date, it was a learning opportunity. I encourage all those of you who are braving the dating jungle, to consider every date as such. Practice makes perfect.

20Aug/094

To Russia! For Love!

I have a dilemma: on September 13th, I am heading to Russia (a.k.a. Motherland) to visit my family (grandparents, aunts/uncles, godparents, etc.) On its own, this is awesome, since I haven’t seen The Family in 2 years. However, the awesomeness of the situation is complicated by the fact that one of my grandfathers (on my dad’s side) is forever trying to coerce (not convince) me to come live in Russia, whether it’s to study, to work, or to get married. So, he wastes no opportunity to try and set me up with “a nice Russian boy”. I love my grandfather, but I just do not want to move to Russia! (I will not state my reasons here) And, how do I tell him so outright without hurting his feelings? (Never mind that my command of Russian is far subpar to express the valid reasons for not wanting to go back there). So, thus far, I’ve avoided his guilt trips by:

  1. Telling him all about my great job in Canada
  2. Stating that I wish to do graduate studies in Harvard or Cambridge rather than some university in Russia (he is a Professor himself, and has a true appreciation for World’s top universities, so he REALLY buys into that; plus, I’m pretty awesome, so I actually stand a chance at one of those universities)
  3. Having a boyfriend or an object of affection that I could talk about at length

Unluckily for me, as he gets older (71 currently; those unreasonable old men!), his desire to have great-grandkids grows. Also exacerbating the situation *this* year, is the fact is that my sister is there (in Russia) currently… with her long-term, live-in boyfriend.

SO, I have challenged myself to the impossible (given my track record): to go on 3 dates with the same guy before my departure to Russia, so that I can at least “talk” about someone to my grandparents and avoid the big “set-up”.

Will I succeed or dramatically fail? Stay tuned, and I’ll keep you posted. I also avow to take an offensive approach to on-line dating, which has – in recent times – been  my biggest source of dates. Thus far, I've taken the "sitting duck" approach: basically waiting for men to message me and not vice versa.

18Aug/090

Bonus points if you can read a map

When it comes to asking for directions, I think that most guys would rather cut off their <insert some appendage here> than actually do it. Although I also have been known to drive around aimlessly whilst trying to find my way, I reserve that for my leisurely drives, and not when I have some place to be … especially on a date.

The following is an account of what transpired when I decided to meet up with Peter, a boy I met on Plenty of Fish. I spent a lot of time talking to Peter prior to meeting up with him. In fact, I would say too much time. The danger with online dating, which is proven by the research coming out in this area, confirms the dangers of ‘getting to know’ someone purely through virtual communication. I recently saw a statistic stating that 11% of on-line daters claim to be ‘in love’ prior to ever meeting the object of their affection face-to-face. People! Let’s stop and think for a second about whom we are really falling in love with here: it’s NOT the person, but rather what that person has told us in writing. (For some humour relief, check out Do You Wanna Date My Avatar – The Guild)

So, on my computer screen, Peter seemed really cool. He had a decent picture (which he sent to me with his initial message; it’s not posted to his public profile), and he was well-spoken (errrr… written); we exchanged a few awesome e-mails; and we both seemed to have a thirst for a first date that was something other than ordinary (i.e. coffee.) So, when we finally decided to meet up, I proposed a walk in the Gatineau Park.

BEFORE, you say anything; I’ve already been chewed out by my friends for deciding to meet a stranger in some secluded mountain park, so hold back on any such comments. Oh, and DON’T do it yourself.

We agreed to meet at noon on Sunday. This was the first time I was driving to our chosen rendez-vous spot, so I Googled the directions, and took off with 30 minutes to spare. Unfortunately, I didn’t take into account the estival road construction, or the epic Google Maps fail that transpired (Google fail? Inconceivable!) Basically, Google was telling me to turn off onto a parkways actually ran above me; which had no on or off ramp. When I realized this at 11:55, I resigned to being late, pulled over and txt’ed Peter announcing my imminent lateness. Then, I promptly headed to the park visitor’s centre to ask for directions (luckily I knew where it was). After the info desk girl straightened me out, I was once again headed to meet my date. I drive-texted (I KNOW! How awful!… and it’s illegal in Quebec too) Peter to let him know I would be there soon. Surprisingly, his reply was:

“Don’t worry, I’m lost too.”

I arrived on location at 12:25 (not too late, right?) and texted Peter once again to let him know I was there, then sat down to wait… and wait… and wait. After 30 mins of waiting, I texted him once more, but Peter reassured me that he was almost there. So, I waited some more. At 1:15 – ready to give up – I decided to text him one final time. This time his reply was:

“Yeah, I can’t find and give up. Want to meet on a patio somewhere back in Ottawa? Drinks on me.”

Really?! What a winner! I probably should have called it quits then, but considering I had a hard time finding the place myself, I agreed to his alternate plan. But, in my mind, Peter already had 2 strikes against him. As it turned out, Strike 3 was just around the corner. When we finally met, Peter was lackluster in more ways than one:

  1. Appearance: he didn’t look at all like in that one photo he had sent me. In fact he looked more like this.
  2. Fidgety: he was visibly uncomfortable, whether it was because of the heat or because he was embarrassed about his lackluster performance.
  3. Boooo(yawn) ring: our conversation seriously lacked flow. In fact, the flow might have been negative.

So, in the end, it was the end of Peter. But, dear men, take heed: even if asking someone for directions may undermine your masculinity (or whatever), when planning a date, figure out where you’re going and get there on time. After all, it’s a woman’s prerogative to be late.

15Aug/090

The douchebag report: Part III – Neil’s deal

It would be inappropriate for me to wrap up the Douchebag Report without telling you what happened to Neil. Well, I gave Neil his review – albeit, I did it over the phone, not via e-mail. Rest assured though, I went over every point with him. In fact, he even took notes! (At least that’s what *he* said).

Not surprisingly, I gave him an overall grade of D: This is not going to work, in bed or out. Goodbye! But, the boy did have some good qualities:

His major strengths were:

  1. Especially attentive; really makes his intentions clear. Definitely expresses interest and continually shows it.
  2. Good looking in the traditional sense.
  3. Very punctual and consciously so; this is much appreciated.

His major weaknesses were:

  1. You need to understand how your actions are perceived by other people; your young age really shines through in this area, and given your chosen career parth, you are likely to make more enemies than friends with your current behavior
  2. Overly flirtatious; you flirt with anyone and anything no matter age or sex. There is no subtlety to your flirtations and this is very unattractive and badly perceived by others.
  3. Exaggeration: you exaggerate and sweat over the small stuff and act like arrogant as if others should know or care about it. In fact, because these things are very insignificant for people other than you or those in your immediate circle of friends, your arrogance is in vain and is often taken for false pretentiousness.

Obviously, Neil was somewhat upset but the things I was saying; he didn’t see it coming. When he started justifying his behavior, talking about how he was really a manwhore (Really? Good to know!) since his last relationship went belly up, I suggested that he take some time off from dating/sleeping around and really reconsider him path of self-destruction. Then, I hit him with a really good line, adapted from something a great friend once said to me: without pain, there can be no change (accentuating that post break-up, one really need to take the time off and feel some pain.)

Not surprisingly, no one had ever really given him feedback like mine, but that’s expected. We, as humans, just don’t like discussing others’ negative characteristics in an upfront manner. Instead, we do this behind their backs.

To conclude, next time you’re breaking up with someone, don’t use clichéd, vague, and ambiguous lines like: “It’s not you, it’s me”; or “I’m just not looking for anything serious right now”. Man up, and tell that person exactly what you’re thinking (but, be nice about it!). Chances are, they will appreciate it more than you will ever know!

13Aug/094

The douchebag report: Part II – breaking up is hard to do, and douchebags are people too…

(See also The Andrea Doria episode of Seinfied. It’s all about being a ‘bad breaker-upper’. It's completely relevant to this post)

So, at this point, breaking up with Neil is inevitable. However, because he had shared with me his desire to pursue a career in politics, I felt that I owed to him some “constructive criticism” because I truly believe in developing individuals and helping them achieve personal growth and success. (I was also massively inspired by my job, as I have to do personnel evaluations.)

My friends, on the other hand, were completely against anything but: “you suck, goodbye”-type of breakup. Other suggestions for breaking up with him included having a conference call so all people from the party could tell him how much of a douchebag he is.

But, I am stubborn and I REALLY wanted to give Neil my piece of mind. So, I created (drum roll please)The Man Review. That’s right, this is a paper (or electronic) evaluation of your relationship or courtship to fill out prior to some important decision regarding the continuity of said ‘-ship’.

N.B. Other creative methods of breaking up include: Build-a-breakup. If you're trying to send a certain message, try this video: It's not fair - Lily Allen.

THE MAN REVIEW

To be used when considering ending a relationship or a courtship, are any other “-ship”.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Here, describe how you met the guy, and why you are faced with the decision you are about to make.

EVALUATION DETAILS:

Interest in me

  1. High interest in me; very enthusiastic to spend time with me and shows it
  2. More than average amount of interest; pays me regular attention
  3. Satisfactory amount of interest; makes attempts to communicate with me regularly
  4. Lackadaisical; sporadically shows interest in me; waits for me to call
  5. Not applicable

Initiative

  1. Go-getter; creates opportunities to go out with me
  2. High; seeks opportunities to go out with me
  3. Average; responds well to suggested plans
  4. Low; relies on me to make plans and contributes very little in terms of planning
  5. Not applicable

Judgment

  1. Exceptionally good; makes decisions based on thorough analysis of possible outcomes
  2. Good; makes decision based on good common sense
  3. Fair; makes good decisions in routine matters
  4. Often makes bad decisions, without thinking through the consequences
  5. Not applicable

Dependability

  1. Exceptionally trustworthy; can be trusted and depended upon wholeheartedly
  2. Can be trusted in most cases; rarely acts in ways that questions my trust
  3. Can be trusted in some situations, though not important ones
  4. Unreliable; cannot be depended or trusted
  5. Not applicable

Communication skills

  1. Excellent communicator; initiates discussion and can discuss a large variety of issues easily and humbly
  2. Strong communicator; gets involved in discussion and contributes positively
  3. Okay communication skills; sometimes jumps into discussion which are outside of his realm of knowledge
  4. Awful communicator; incapable of being an active or effective contributor to a discussion topic

Relations with others

  1. Everyone’s pal; makes new friends easily and does not need to be babysat at social functions
  2. Very easygoing; does not have need to make friends with everyone
  3. Gets along with people well; needs to be liked by everyone
  4. Sometimes contrary and unwilling to get to know new people and explore potential friendships
  5. Not applicable

Kissing

  1. Master kisser; knows how and when to initiate and makes me forget reality
  2. Good kisser; follows my lead and willing to learn
  3. Average kisser; technique is not very developed but shows potential
  4. Bad kisser – does not take hints
  5. Not applicable

Performance in bedroom

  1. Zeus in bed; asks for feedback and gives me what I want and need
  2. Excellent lover; satisfies me most of the time
  3. Not very experienced, but a keen learner and listens for feedback
  4. Knows his stuff but assumes too much; doesn’t ask for likes/dislikes
  5. Mediocre; cares little for my pleasure
  6. Not applicable

Physical appearance

  1. Super-model hot; gives Brad Pitt a run for his money
  2. Good looking in the traditional sense
  3. Cute; his personality shines right through
  4. Average; could do better for myself
  5. Good from far; far from good

Wealth

  1. Sugar daddy!
  2. Constant increasing wealth
  3. Average income
  4. Low-level income
  5. EI collector/Milking the welfare system
  6. Not applicable (I don't know)

Punctuality

  1. Acceptable
  2. Unacceptable

Acceptance of criticisms and suggestions

  1. Appreciative and willing
  2. Somewhat reluctant to accept constructive feedback
  3. Does not appreciate or retain any feedback
  4. Not applicable

MAJOR STRENGTHS

1. Compliment the guy; I'm sure he has some good qualities

2. If you can't think of anything, take a negative characteristic, and phrase is positively

3.  I.e. you show much potential as a boyfriend

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

1. In telling him how much he sucks, don't forget to phrase constructively

2. I.e. "you need to establish mutual boundaries. I don't appreciate it when you call me  50 times a day. Others may appreciate such attention, but this needs to be discussed before you upgrade your cell phone package.

3. Or: "be conscious of how your body language is perceived by others. Your attention can be misconstrued as overt flirtation, bordering harassment"

OVERALL GRADE AND VERDICT: ____

A - You are a definite keeper; future husband material

B - I will keep you around now; you show potential

C - I’m breaking up with you, but... do you want to retain the benefits?

D - This is not going to work, in bed or out. Goodbye!

F - Get the f*ck out; if you try to contact me, I will call the police